Login   Register
 Login    Register
Guns
_me
User avatar
Revisionist
 
Rank: User
Posts: 2,587 | Offline
Joined: Sep 15, 2012
Digital Blackface wrote:so what's your stance on Muslim refugees _me?

As long as they are vetted, I have no problems with them. But they have to join America and our rules and customs. And just like Christians don't get to ignore laws they don't like, neither should Muslims (or Jews or Buddhists or Sikhs).

It is the lack of melting in our "Melting Pot" that is our issue, not the specific ingredients.
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin

OldSnake
User avatar
stupid moron with an ugly face & a big butt
 
Rank: User
Posts: 16,021 | Online
Joined: Dec 5, 2011

_me wrote:
OldSnake wrote:
_me wrote:Killing a bunch of innocent people is still incredible rare. Almost all mass shootings involve the targeting of a specific person/location.


Oh so then it's not a problem then? So why are you bitching about it in the first place?

Because mass shooting at a specific target is NOT incredibly rare. They happen almost daily in America.

Right, and now you're shifting to a whole other issue to try and find some debate points on. You're not good at this.

Do they have international slave trades? Or do they just have citizens under bondage?

Pretty sure I said chattel slavery multiple times. Or you looking to parse hairs over what is and isn't slavery so you can post that incredibly misleading sex slavery report and go "America does it tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo"?
wbeaumo wrote:Clearly, this place is crawling with posters whose unofficial leader is that cockroach P.O.

OldSnake
User avatar
stupid moron with an ugly face & a big butt
 
Rank: User
Posts: 16,021 | Online
Joined: Dec 5, 2011

_me wrote:
OldSnake wrote:
_me wrote:France gave up slaves in 1794. England in 1807. Spain in 1811. Netherlands in 1814. The founding fathers were still alive when the rest of western society stopped thinking it was a good idea to own other people.


You should look up American history a bit more, the US took measures to end slavery long before any of those countries, they also did it without a professional military as well. Hint hint, trying to get rich people to things without a military to force them to do it was pretty fucking tough back then. You should take a closer look at some of those French and British colonies in their "post slavery" days as well. Spoiler alert, there was still slavery.

And every time a state or territory passed a law limiting slavery, there was a "Missouri Compromise" or "Kansas-Nebraska Act" or "Fugitive Slave Act" to negate it.


Free men lived in the North, no black person was born into slavery in most Northern states past 1800. You can diminish all you want, as is the norm for liberals, but America was working itself towards banning slavery and doing so while fighting two wars against the world's largest empire and not having much of a professional military. Exceptions are always made for poor countries today, especially ones filled with colored people, who are behind the "woke times" but America when it was just trying to survive? "Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu whitey!"
Last edited by OldSnake on November 7th, 2017, 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
wbeaumo wrote:Clearly, this place is crawling with posters whose unofficial leader is that cockroach P.O.

_me
User avatar
Revisionist
 
Rank: User
Posts: 2,587 | Offline
Joined: Sep 15, 2012

I will admit I didn't know the phrase "chattel slavey". I thought that meant "indentured servitude" since I thought that of what most modern "slavery" is.
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin

_me
User avatar
Revisionist
 
Rank: User
Posts: 2,587 | Offline
Joined: Sep 15, 2012

OldSnake wrote:
_me wrote:
OldSnake wrote:
You should look up American history a bit more, the US took measures to end slavery long before any of those countries, they also did it without a professional military as well. Hint hint, trying to get rich people to things without a military to force them to do it was pretty fucking tough back then. You should take a closer look at some of those French and British colonies in their "post slavery" days as well. Spoiler alert, there was still slavery.

And every time a state or territory passed a law limiting slavery, there was a "Missouri Compromise" or "Kansas-Nebraska Act" or "Fugitive Slave Act" to negate it.


Free men lived in the North, no black person was born into slavery in most Northern states past 1800. You can diminish all you want, as is the norm for liberals, but America was working itself towards banning slavery and doing so while fighting two wars against the world's largest empire and not having much of a professional military.

Yes, half of America (white people) was working towards banning slavery. But the other half (also white people) was doing this…

Image

This was totally legal. To abduct a free, legal citizen from a northern state and enslave them thanks to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. But since it was white people on both sides of the debate, I don't really see what "Fuck You whitey" has to do with it?

Exceptions are always made for poor countries today, especially ones filled with colored people, who are behind the "woke times" but America when it was just trying to survive? "Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu whitey!"

I don't think I am making any exceptions for poor or darker countries. I judge people (and countries) on their actions, not their ethnicities. I already said I think we are better than them (and any country than legalizes discrimination). Before we were worse (when are actions were worse, like owning human beings). Now we are better (when our actions are better, like treating women as equals).
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin

OldSnake
User avatar
stupid moron with an ugly face & a big butt
 
Rank: User
Posts: 16,021 | Online
Joined: Dec 5, 2011

_me wrote:Yes, half of America (white people) was working towards banning slavery. But the other half (also white people) was doing this…


Why was one so anti slavery and the other pro?

I don't think I am making any exceptions for poor or darker countries.


I have missed your posts condemning African slave masters for capturing and selling their slaves to wealthy white men (in fact you seemed to imply it didn't even exist in the 1800s) or your posts condemning CURRENT chattel slavery in Africa
wbeaumo wrote:Clearly, this place is crawling with posters whose unofficial leader is that cockroach P.O.

SharonNeedles
User avatar
All you people are sick in the head
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 24,712 | Online
Joined: Sep 13, 2008

https://twitter.com/benwikler/status/928075813857255424
LeykisMan! wrote: I enjoy 1780s and all his faggy threads.

Digital Blackface
User avatar
 
Rank: User
Posts: 2,107 | Online
Joined: Sep 12, 2017

It’s sad that taking away people’s rights is so popular with Democrats

AndySmith
User avatar
Im not special.
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 11,717 | Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 2013

Digital Blackface wrote:It’s sad that taking away people’s rights is so popular with Democrats


They learned it from conservatives.

Digital Blackface
User avatar
 
Rank: User
Posts: 2,107 | Online
Joined: Sep 12, 2017

oh yeah, like when?

_me
User avatar
Revisionist
 
Rank: User
Posts: 2,587 | Offline
Joined: Sep 15, 2012

OldSnake wrote:
_me wrote:Yes, half of America (white people) was working towards banning slavery. But the other half (also white people) was doing this…


Why was one so anti slavery and the other pro?


Money. The same reason most people do anything.

I don't think I am making any exceptions for poor or darker countries.


I have missed your posts condemning African slave masters for capturing and selling their slaves to wealthy white men (in fact you seemed to imply it didn't even exist in the 1800s) or your posts condemning CURRENT chattel slavery in Africa[/quote]
I didn't know I had to condemn things that no one argues for. Is anyone going around saying that African slave masters or the current leaders of African slavery are infallible people who made the 2nd amendment perfect? That is why I am not talking about Africa's role in the slave trade.
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin

poochies uncle
User avatar
 
Rank: User
Posts: 3,934 | Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2013

Digital Blackface wrote:regressive leftists are just white supremacists with guilty consciences


Why is everything that comes out your mouth a rightwing talking point that has been around for years. I know it’s new to you but seriously come up with an original thought

Digital Blackface
User avatar
 
Rank: User
Posts: 2,107 | Online
Joined: Sep 12, 2017

says the guy regurgitating lies about the 2nd amendment being about slavery from Marxist retards

poochies uncle
User avatar
 
Rank: User
Posts: 3,934 | Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2013

Marxist , liberal socialist durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr dur

poochies uncle
User avatar
 
Rank: User
Posts: 3,934 | Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2013

Dur

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests