Login   Register
 Login    Register
Oscars 2016
appleshampoo
User avatar
Apples | Ham | Poo
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 10,148 | Online
Joined: Aug 30, 2009
Pascal's Pager wrote:I don't understand what the big deal is with a 3-1/2 hour show. The Super Bowl generally runs 4 hours or so, nobody complains.

Because it's actually interesting. Well. Usually; the last one was pretty boring for everyone except Denver fans.
OldSnake wrote:my ultimate goal of becoming the most powerful living internet organism will be achieved

SharonNeedles
User avatar
All you people are sick in the head
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 24,979 | Offline
Joined: Sep 13, 2008

They should cut out the boring categories like sound mixing and editing.
LeykisMan! wrote: I enjoy 1780s and all his faggy threads.

Pascal's Pager
User avatar
aka: the pretentious bigmouth
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 7,717 | Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2012

appleshampoo wrote:
Pascal's Pager wrote:I don't understand what the big deal is with a 3-1/2 hour show. The Super Bowl generally runs 4 hours or so, nobody complains.

Because it's actually interesting. Well. Usually; the last one was pretty boring for everyone except Denver fans.


Why would someone watch a program for any length of time if they don't find it interesting?
Nathan Bateman wrote:After a long day of Turing tests, you gotta unwind.

cantjudge
User avatar
69 feels like 69, amirite?
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 6,629 | Online
Joined: Jan 26, 2012

Why doesn't everyone just DVR this shit and stop complaining about length?

HowWouldIKnowThat
User avatar
My bad, didn't even look at what thread we were in
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 16,835 | Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 2013

Pascal's Pager wrote:
appleshampoo wrote:
Pascal's Pager wrote:I don't understand what the big deal is with a 3-1/2 hour show. The Super Bowl generally runs 4 hours or so, nobody complains.

Because it's actually interesting. Well. Usually; the last one was pretty boring for everyone except Denver fans.


Why would someone watch a program for any length of time if they don't find it interesting?


It's a live event and people want to see who wins the big awards. They know that, so they drag out the show to sell extra commercials.
cantjudge wrote:Oh, I thought all the black wangs would help.


HuellHauser
User avatar
alright, calm down internet
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 45,929 | Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 2010

cantjudge wrote:Why doesn't everyone just DVR this shit and stop complaining about length?


I don't watch for the show, I watch to see the results as they happen. DVRing it would defeat the purpose. But I also don't complain about the length of it, it's always like this so who cares. We know it going in.
beeney wrote:my vagina and asshole felt like it exploded open.



Huell's Haberdashery Hangout Hour: The Podcast

Mr. Pointy
User avatar
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 6,631 | Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Life tweeting is the most fun part about the Oscars.
Lori Loughlin > Nicole Kidman

Pascal's Pager
User avatar
aka: the pretentious bigmouth
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 7,717 | Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2012

HowWouldIKnowThat wrote:
Pascal's Pager wrote:
appleshampoo wrote:Because it's actually interesting. Well. Usually; the last one was pretty boring for everyone except Denver fans.


Why would someone watch a program for any length of time if they don't find it interesting?


It's a live event and people want to see who wins the big awards. They know that, so they drag out the show to sell extra commercials.


Just like the Super Bowl. :)
Nathan Bateman wrote:After a long day of Turing tests, you gotta unwind.

HuellHauser
User avatar
alright, calm down internet
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 45,929 | Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 2010

burnt
beeney wrote:my vagina and asshole felt like it exploded open.



Huell's Haberdashery Hangout Hour: The Podcast

HowWouldIKnowThat
User avatar
My bad, didn't even look at what thread we were in
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 16,835 | Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 2013

First 3 quarters of the Super Bowl isn't played by NBC's audio production crew.
cantjudge wrote:Oh, I thought all the black wangs would help.


lovelinefan
User avatar
I don't have a dog and I don't like french fries
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 15,557 | Offline
Joined: Feb 8, 2009

I think they should make the In Memoriam segment a special. Everyone always gets pissy that certain people weren't included. A special would give enough time for everyone who died to be listed & it could go more in depth on who they were.
Cherry Pie wrote:In the butt? Wait...no. I wasn't paying attention. Oops.


Lovelinefan ain't nothin to fuck with

backsack
User avatar
I like urban kids
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 23,543 | Offline
Joined: Nov 2, 2010

But the point is to honor them during the Oscars.
1780's Guy wrote:Per usual, sack is correct.

Cherry Pie wrote:You're stupid, Todd.

HuellHauser
User avatar
alright, calm down internet
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 45,929 | Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 2010

They should've made each award a different show.
beeney wrote:my vagina and asshole felt like it exploded open.



Huell's Haberdashery Hangout Hour: The Podcast

SharonNeedles
User avatar
All you people are sick in the head
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 24,979 | Offline
Joined: Sep 13, 2008

lovelinefan wrote:I think they should make the In Memoriam segment a special. Everyone always gets pissy that certain people weren't included. A special would give enough time for everyone who died to be listed & it could go more in depth on who they were.


But would people watch? I wouldn't.
LeykisMan! wrote: I enjoy 1780s and all his faggy threads.

lovelinefan
User avatar
I don't have a dog and I don't like french fries
 
Rank: Vetted
Posts: 15,557 | Offline
Joined: Feb 8, 2009

backsack wrote:But the point is to honor them during the Oscars.

OK
Cherry Pie wrote:In the butt? Wait...no. I wasn't paying attention. Oops.


Lovelinefan ain't nothin to fuck with

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Stockholmsyndrome, zinc and 6 guests